Wear and Tear and Security Deposits Under California Law

AUTHOR(S):

Joseph Tobener

Tenant Lawyer & Adjunct Law Professor

Joseph Tobener

22+ years of practicing law. Partner at a Tenant Law Firm. Featured on NYTimes, Reuters, Wired, and the Los Angeles Times.

INFORMATION VERIFIED BY:

Christina Collins

California Tenant Lawyer

Christina Collins

18 years of practicing law. Associate Attorney. Juris Doctor from the Golden Gate University School of Law.

Jacqueline Ravenscroft

California Tenant Lawyer

Jacqueline Ravenscroft

12+ years of practicing law. Partner at a tenant law firm. Tenant-landlord law instructor at San Francisco State University. Featured in the San Francisco Chronicle and Plaintiff Magazine.

Share

Security deposit disputes over “normal wear and tear”

Many landlords and tenants struggle with how to define “ordinary or normal wear and tear” with respect to security deposits. Most disputes over security deposits come down to what constitutes normal wear and tear. When a tenant moves out of a unit, the landlord may deduct from a tenant’s security deposit to repair damage to the premises that is caused by the tenant, but only for damage beyond ordinary wear and tear. Cal. Civil Code § 1950.5(b)(2). Residential rental leases often contain clauses requiring a tenant to maintain a unit in a “good and clean condition” and to return the unit in “the same condition as received, excepting normal wear and tear.”

What does “ordinary or normal wear and tear” mean?

Generally, “ordinary or normal wear and tear” is the unavoidable deterioration of a unit resulting from normal use by the tenant. A repair issue warranting a deduction is typically damage that was avoidable and negligent, and not due to simply living in or using the property. For example, a carpet worn thin due to normal traffic is ordinary wear and tear, while a cigarette burn in the carpet is preventable negligence.

Additionally, a tenant may be charged for cleaning where the tenant has caused filth beyond ordinary use. For instance, an inordinate amount of pet hair or a urine smell left in the carpet would be beyond normal wear and tear as these are avoidable conditions and beyond normal use.

A good rule of thumb is if a condition was caused by the tenant’s own neglect, misuse, or abuse, and not from just using or living in the premises, it will likely be considered a damage that the tenant will be financially responsible for.

Common Examples

 

Ordinary Wear and TearTenant Liable
A few small nail holes, chips, scuffs or smudgesAn inordinate amount of nail holes, or a gaping hole in the wall
Faded paintUnauthorized paint colors, water damage caused by hanging plants, furniture scrapes, crayon marks
Carpet faded or worn thinHoles, rips, tears, burns, or stains on carpet
Minor scuffs on wood floorsGouges or excessive scratches due to pet claws or from moving furniture
Scratched or worn enamel on bathtubs or sinksChipped or broken enamel
Garbage disposal motor deadBroken garbage disposal due to avocado pits placed down the drain
Loose door handles or cabinet pullsMissing door handles or cabinet pulls
A few small nail holes, chips, scuffs or smudgesAn inordinate amount of nail holes, or a gaping hole in the wall
Stuck door or windowBroken door or window
Worn countertopsCuts in or burns on countertops
Running toiletBroken toilet tank
Dirty mini-blindsMissing or broken mini-blinds
Leaky faucetStructural damage due to unreported water leak

 

How can a tenant protect their security deposit from repair deductions for damage?

Prior to or at move in, tenants should do a walkthrough of the unit and document any areas of damage and deterioration. The tenant should take photographs if possible. A copy of the results of this initial walkthrough should be given to the landlord. This will give both landlord and tenant a record of the exact condition the unit was in at the time tenant moved in.

During the tenancy, tenants should promptly notify the landlord of any items in need of repair, especially those that can result in extensive damage later that the landlord may try to hold the tenant responsible for. A tenant who allows a leak to go unreported for months may be held responsible because damage caused by neglect is not normal wear and tear.

A tenant is entitled to request a walkthrough inspection just prior to vacating. Cal. Civil Code § 1950.5. This can take place two weeks before the termination of the tenancy. Id. Based on this walkthrough inspection, the landlord is required to give an itemized list specifying proposed repairs or cleanings. This walkthrough is meant to provide tenant with the opportunity to address any issues before vacating.

Please contact the experienced tenant rights attorneys at Tobener Ravenscroft LLC should you have any questions about normal or ordinary wear and tear.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

What is “normal” wear & tear?

Normal wear and tear is deterioration that occurs from the reasonable and ordinary use of the rental unit over time. It reflects the natural and gradual breakdown of materials and finishes that happens with everyday living.

What is NOT considered normal wear and tear?

Damage that exceeds ordinary wear and tear—such as large holes in walls, broken windows, torn screens, pet stains, or other damage caused by negligence, carelessness, accident, or abuse—is not considered normal wear and tear and can be charged against a security deposit.

What does California law say about security deposits and damage?

Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5, a landlord may withhold a tenant’s security deposit for the repair of damage to the residential rental property caused by the tenant, but only for damage that is not normal wear and tear.

Can a landlord charge for painting due to wear and tear?

No. A landlord generally cannot charge a tenant for repainting or refinishing due to fading, minor scuffs, or other deterioration resulting from normal and expected use if the unit is being returned in substantially the same condition as at move‑in, aside from ordinary wear and tear.

Can a landlord charge for carpet cleaning or replacement due to normal use?

A landlord may be permitted to clean carpets after a tenancy, but carpet replacement may only be charged against the security deposit if the damage exceeds normal wear and tear. If carpets are worn simply due to age and use, replacement costs are not a proper deduction.

How should landlords and tenants assess damage?

Assessments should distinguish between deterioration from ordinary use and damage caused by tenant neglect or abuse. Only the latter can be charged against the security deposit.

Are landlords required to prove damage is beyond normal wear and tear?

Yes. A landlord who withholds any portion of a security deposit for damage must provide a written itemized statement with receipts or good‑faith estimates for repairs and demonstrate that the deducted amounts are for damage beyond normal wear and tear, as required under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5.

Should tenants document the condition of the unit?

Yes. Tenants should take photos or videos at move‑in and move‑out and keep records of communications, repairs, and maintenance to support their position that any deterioration is due to normal wear and tear.

What happens if a landlord wrongfully deducts for normal wear and tear?

If a landlord improperly withholds security deposit money for what is actually normal wear and tear, a tenant may be entitled to recover the wrongfully withheld amount and pursue legal remedies under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5.

Should tenants consult an attorney about security deposit disputes?

Yes. Because disputes over what constitutes normal wear and tear versus damage can be complex and costly, tenants should consider consulting an experienced attorney to understand their rights and defend against improper security deposit deductions.

    Contact Us Contact Us